The overall market as measured by the Dow Jones Industrial Average failed to follow through with the move higher that our technical indicators signaled would occur. Granted no set of indicators is flawless, and we are in time when news and conditions changes daily and sometimes multiple times during the same day. However, Friday's close of the Dow Jones Industrial Average at 8,378.95 was below the closing low of 8,451.19 set two week's earlier on the 10th. This was a bearish trading signal in that the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed below near term support. While there is some support at 8,235.81 and 7,762.34 I am expecting the Dow Jones Industrial Average to move lower and test the low set in 2002 & 2003. As the chart below shows, I am expecting to see support at 7,524.06 and then 7,286.27 If those levels fail to hold then we'll see some support in the low 6,000 range, and then no meaningful support until the 5,700 level.
In the July 21st edition of the Sterling Weekly I listed five (5) factors I thought were weighing on the market. They were Financial System Weakness, High Oil Prices, Dollar Weakness, Taxes, and Political Uncertainty. I discussed financial system weakness in the August 13th edition, and the price of oil in the September 9th edition, and Dollar Weakness in the September 15th edition, of the Sterling Weekly. Since then we have seen the price of Oil fall by over 50%, and the US Dollar strengthen against the other major currencies of the world. Last week in the October 21st edition of the Sterling Weekly, I briefly discussed the Tax Issues facing the country and the two (2) alternative proposals, the Flat Tax, and the Fair Tax. This week, I want to take a look at the political uncertainty facing this country and how a win by either Presidential candidate will either be positive of negative for each sector.
As I have written several times in the past, we have a very wide gap in the ideologies of our two (2) Presidential candidates, and politics is the single biggest influence on the market. While most polls have Mr. Obama leading Mr. McCain, and being the most likely winner of the President Election, there is still some level of uncertainty due to the unique nature of this election. As a result of this uncertainty is placing a great deal of downward pressure on the market, it's either that or the market is trying to tell us that the expected winner is going to be bad for the US economy. I track a variety of market indices on a daily basis, the major market indices and several sector indices. In the table below I have attempted to organize the various sector indices provide my opinion of how each of the Presidential candidates will effect the separate indices based upon the following major policy differences: Taxes, Regulation, Tort Reform, and Labor Issues (believe it or not this will have a big impact in the next 2 years). I think everyone at this point in time should be pretty well aware of their differences on these topics, so I have attempted to just summarize how I see the difference.
Sector / Index |
McCain |
Obama |
Comments |
Banking 'BIX', 'BKX' |
Negative |
More Negative |
Both candidates have made rather negative comments that don't indicate a good future for this sector. Unfortunately Obama's support of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) leads me to believe it will fair worse under his presidency than McCain's. |
Biotech 'BKX' |
Positive |
Negative |
I see a very sharp contrast between how the policies of Obama will effect this industry vs. those of McCain. Obama's support of the trial lawyers is very big negative for this industry. |
Consumer 'CMR' |
Neutral |
Negative |
Tax issues are the difference. |
Chemicals 'CEX' |
Positive |
Negative |
I see the issues in the Presidential election that effect this industry being the price of petroleum as a raw material, taxes, and tort liability. |
Commodities 'CRX' |
Negative |
Positive |
I see Mr. Obama allowing looser monetary policy which will allow a greater level of inflation in this industry. |
Cyclicals 'CYC' |
Neutral |
Neutral |
No opinion on this industry. |
High Tech 'MSH' |
Positive |
Negative |
I see the tax policy and the catering to organized labor being the difference here. |
Pharmaceuticals 'DRG' |
Neutral |
Negative |
I do not see McCain as being positive for this industry, but I see the tax issues, trade, and tort issues being the big negative by Mr. Obama. |
Healthcare 'HCX' |
Positive |
Negative |
Tax issues and tort liability make the difference here. Socializing medicine is going to be bad. |
Insurance 'IUX' |
Positive |
Negative |
Tax issues and tort liability make the difference here. |
Retailers 'RLX' |
Positive |
Neutral / Negative |
I see a very stark difference between the two (2) candidates. Tax issues and the support of big labor being the difference. |
Airlines 'XAL' |
Positive |
Negative |
I see the big difference with this sector being the labor and the energy policies. |
Broker/Dealer 'XBD' |
Negative |
Negative |
Neither candidate is saying anything positive with respects to this industry. |
Natural Gas 'XNG' |
Positive |
Negative |
More domestic drilling vs. the same and a windfall profits tax. |
Oil & Gas 'XOI' |
Positive |
Negative |
More domestic drilling vs. the same policies we have now and a windfall profits tax. |
Transports 'TRAN'
|
Positive |
Negative |
I see the big difference with this sector being the labor and the energy policies. |
Consumer |
Positive |
Negative |
This is a free trade vs. trade restrictions issue. |
Tax Payer |
Positive |
Negative |
McCain wants to keep the Bush Tax cuts in place. Obama wants to let them expire and then give 95% of Americans a tax cut. If it sounds too good to be true it probably is. |
Investor |
Positive / Neutral |
Negative |
Tax and Tort issues are the difference here. |
I have agonized over the publication of this edition of the Sterling Weekly more than any other I can remember. I did not set out to endorse one political candidate over another, and I know that the opinions laid out in the table above will upset some readers of the Sterling Weekly. However due to the starkt differences in these candidates I see one potentially causing a very sharp contraction in the economy, and one attempting to clean up the cause of the problems, which I see as too much government regulation of our economy. I am not endorsing one candidate over another; but I do believe that ultimately our problems result from our voting population not understanding what they are voting for.
It will take some time, but once this election is over and the dust settles, the market will begin to sort the winners from the losers in the various sectors. Investors and traders will also fall into one (1) of these two (2) groups. I know which one (1) I want to be in.
|